General Counsel
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
Mr. Greg Morse
Office of the Commissioner for Patents
FOURTH NOTIFICATION OF A PERSISTENT MASSIVE IP VIOLATION, BREACH OF ETHICS, AND UPDATING OF INVENTION CONCEPTIONS
Sometimes public employees have difficulties to fully accomplish their duties bringing embarrassment and negative consequences to citizens not aware of their mistakes.
As a Pennsylvania State University sponsored PhD student I was supposed to have no concerns about my fees as my research institution employer never had problem to honor them.
In the second semester I got surprised when I had all my courses dropped for not paying a debt of ‘ZERO’ dollar. I got astonished afterwards when I received a fine for late payment of my fees of ‘ZERO’ dollar debt and later enrollment.
It took me more than two hours to convince a Pennsylvanian State University employee that I would never collect a penalty of $50 for late payment of ‘ZERO’ dollar of my fees. She was obeying the Law prosecuting a student that had a misdeed of not paying his debt of ‘ZERO’ dollar. Incredibly Bursar cancelled all my courses because I had a debt of ‘ZERO’ dollar. Since such employee was doing his duty I had to talk to each faculty of dropped disciplines to allow me to have my enrollment back again. People following the Law not only dropped my courses but also charged me with late enrollment as they dropped my courses.
Frankly, it does not require a high intelligence to understand that a debt of ‘ZERO’ dollar is a non sense and a clear mistake. A rational employee could have prevented me lots of embarrassment in the very early beginning. In some extent it was disrespected as a regular student that pays his bills and is an exemplar citizen with honored academic recognition.
I did not take the institution to court as I solved the problem in two hours incisively arguing about common fairness. I was not told which Law was used to fix such mistake.
How long will it take to convince USPTO that my PhD textbooks regarding HYDROLOGY have advanced knowledge that cannot be ignored on patenting affairs?
Around ten years ago I bumped to a sort of ‘scientific discovery’ in hydrodynamics. My first US patent 6,766,817 July 2004 rich in terminology from Soil Physics and Hydrogeology was issued easily relieving any potential conflicting matter.
I got surprised soon afterwards of my first patent approval noticing its advanced hydrology with common knowledge more than a century standing on my PhD textbooks being ignored in favor of a broad laypeople shallow terminology not even employed in Hydrology.
Then my partner and Patent Attorney Mr. Kermit Lopez suggested me to send IDS requests to those involved in the patents that I thought were having conflicting matter. Easily with some hits on my computer keyboard I spread hundreds of IDS requests. Wealth and rich Law firms complained of losing millions of dollars for having to make their Patent Attorneys to read and understand the advanced hydrology of my patents. Some of them were even trying to bring me to court for spamming. They were arguing that I was breaking the Law for asking them to comply with the Law. That is awkward.
They pressured my partners that are a small Law firm to make me stop. So, my partners abandoned my project pursuing a ‘scientific discovery’ afraid of financial consequences since USPTO was not protecting my issued patents.
Why USPTO has not been protecting my issued patents?
BREACH OF ETHICS
USPTO is not only scientifically violating my patents but also running toward ethical issues:
Surgeons do surgery, Chemists work with Chemistry, Physicists handle Physics, Engineers assess Engineering, and so on. Why USPTO is assigning Patent Examiners to approve hydrological issues by non Hydrologists?
Mechanical Engineers are not Hydrologists even though they have some basics in Mechanic of Fluids but their expertise in Hydrology is far away from many disciplines commonly taught at Geosciences and Soil Sciences.
How important is to understanding a deep Hydrology?
After a thorough analysis at the patenting system taking advantage of present instant internet access I could figure out a clear pattern that Hydrology is being neglected by a long persistent bias from breaching of ethics:
1. Conductivity features the propriety of conduction allowing an element being tracked in time and space. Many professionals understand and employ Heat/Thermal Conductivity for heat assessment important to many devices. Today USPTO has 63,481 issued patents discussing about it.
2. Hydrology employs the same conception to track down fluids moving through porosity. But, only 427 issued patents discuss about Hydraulic Conductivity.
3. Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity is when the fluid is moving through porosity by negative pressure, or suction, the same phenomenon that takes place on wicks of oil lamps, and lay people call it wicking. Hydrology avoids wick terminology because of the Thermodynamics compliance not important to Soil Physics and Hydrogeology. To my surprise only 18 issued patents discuss about Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity and 3 of them are mine.
4. Patenting Bias by Breaching of Ethics: Hydrologists have not been involved much in patenting affairs even it is common knowledge on text books that Henry Darcy, a French Engineer, early in 1856 proposed a Law describing Saturated Flow and in 1907 Edgard Buckingham proposed an equation to portray fluids moving through unsaturated porosity. Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow is around a century in the scientific literature but my 3 patents were the first to mention it into the patenting affairs.
5. Laypeople Terminology: Unsaturated hydraulic flow has been handled by laypeople non Hydrologists since USPTO issued 22,498 patents that discuss about wick/wicking and none of them discuss important technical issues like conductivity, hydraulic zones, anisotropy, void geometry, self-sustaining properties, molecular connectivity, etc. It is clear that inventors, Patent Attorneys, and Patent Examiners are non Hydrologists to push toward advanced hydrology common on text books.
USPTO bias is curbing Hydrology by violating academic structure of sciences: USPTO has more than 4500 Patent Examiners but I believe that none of them has background in Soil Science or Hydrogeology to understand a deep hydrology of fluids moving on porosity that is standing on scientific literature more than a century.
USPTO assigned Fluidic Handling 3750 under Mechanical Engineering 3700 according to the Patent Technology Management Center.
I studied agricultural sciences during 14 years and I never had Mechanical Engineers neither as Professors nor as peer students.
Until now only 18 issued patents address Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity which is the measurement of fluids on porosity as taught in Soil Physics and Hydrogeology. All Patent Examiners approving such patents are possibly Mechanical Engineers according to their profile of patenting approval:
Hezron Williams approved 6 patents from a total of 7,024 at USPTO
Gerald Michalsky approved 2 patents from a total of 3,245 at USPTO (6,766.817 6,918,404)
Frank Tsay approved 2 patents from a total of 1,255 at USPTO
Stewart Levy approved 2 patents from a total of 2,068 at USPTO
Helen Kwok approved 1 patent from a total of 757 at USPTO
Eileen Lillis approved 1 patent from a total of 1,272 at USPTO
John Chapman approved 1 patent from a total of 1,254 at USPTO
George Suchfield approved 1 patent from a total of 2,526 at USPTO
Ivars Cintins approved 1 patent from a total of 1,855 at USPTO
Anh Vo approved 1 patent from a total of 786 at USPTO (7,066,586)
My issued patent 6,766.817 affect wick/wicking that fails on oil lamps as well as capillarity that is not inside tube structures of capillaries for failing to address Unsaturated Hydraulic Flow on random porosity. Combining wick/wicking plus capillary/capillarity the total of patents addressing fluids moving on porous systems reach 96,601 issued patents.
When I asked USPTO to cancel around 22,000 patents on wick/wicking it was because such patents are already technically obsolete and nearly useless for ignoring common knowledge more a century standing on scientific literature.
As analogy, this situation portrays USPTO granting kites IP when airplanes are already flying high in the sky. I think that this is unacceptable.
CONCEPTIONS OF INVENTION – Power vs. Knowledge
Please, read the attached article ‘Study predicts 75 percent of overweight in US by 2015’
Why are Americans betraying Nature functioning and hurting itself?
In some extent it is taking place because Lawyers use their power to ignore Science suppressing common knowledge.
Please, read the attached article ‘When questions of science come to a courtroom, truth has many faces’.
Justice Scalia said ‘I told you before I am not a scientist’. No Courtroom has scientific expertise to decide about the functioning of science. This violation of science cannot be solved in courtrooms. Textbooks offer common knowledge to be read, accepted, and complied with.
I do not feel comfortable having my PhD textbooks being violated by Patent Examiners missing common knowledge in Soil Physics and Hydrogeology. There is a sort of competition between knowledge and power hurting human affairs.
As a Ph. D. trained in science I would like to register some statements for USPTO to update its institutional mission:
Modern life is not improving human existence as obesity is growing and spreading around the world.
Inventing a new device has a positive and a negative side. The negative side can increase enormously when it violates some important balance towards the fundaments of nature functioning.
It is easier to invent new devices replacing man work than to convince man to continue working their muscles in order to keep a needed physiological health.
New inventions let excessive food chasing man which is becoming weak and flaccid to run away and understand new elusive factors in the environment.
Humans are biological machines designed by nature during millions of years of evolution having continuous body exercise and a specific diet inherited from those conditions. Man came from a harsh environment with scarce food imprinting a need for continuous body exercise and a wild appetite. Inventors need to be aware of such damage to human existence they are promoting in order to achieve economic profit pushing human existence off a balance with their creation. For example, human digestive physiology is not adapted to fast food as consequence of thermal, mechanical, and chemical effect to human food bringing changes hard to cope resulting to diabetes and many other side-effects.
How much credit can be given to new ideas that results in such side effect to human lifestyles?
Humans as part of the life system were born to solve problems. The problems we are facing now will be solved some centuries down the line as new ones will emerge. It means that not everybody will become obese, but the growing problem may unleash broad consequences to those ones relying blindly on institutions like USPTO that fails its clear duty.
Nature is in charge of human existence since the beginning of life millions of years ago. More and more we are learning that man motivated by economic reasons are likely to interfere to many processes resulting many levels of clear negative side-effects. Flawed conceptions distort human values. For example, milk is a product good for the economy but not for human health, unless as a baby taking it from our mothers. Around 40% of human adults cannot digest milk since the production of lactase, an enzyme that digest milk lactose, is discontinued as we grow. On the other hand fruits that are so good to humans because, if we originated from apes, we were eating it during our evolution. Fruits are not that friendly to the economy and mass manipulation by large companies and media marketing.
I am curious how much obese will Americans become till the obesity rate start coming down again since intelligent people learn about their endeavors solving the problems they face daily.
Advanced technological development can become an illusion if humans do not use their claimed intelligence to achieve precisely a high level of balance with their nature functioning.
As an outstanding scientist I am aware that my claims will be considered and solved since common knowledge standing on my PhD textbooks cannot be neglected. I just do not want to wait 20 to 40 years for it to take place since I am accumulating personal and professional damage just because USPTO employees are not doing their duty.
Nowadays there is an abrupt change on the way we can do science and communicate. It is faster to read published patents weekly by USPTO than standing up and opening books on shelves behind my computer in Brazil.
Consequently, it is time for USPTO to curb bureaucracy and start solving the problems to accomplish its institutional duty.
My suggestion to the USPTO is the following:
1. Stop issuing new patents that involve fluid moving on porosity by Patent Examiners that are not Hydrologists;
2. Hire some Patent Examiners with background in Hydrogeology/Soil Physics;
3. Assign Hydrologist as Primary Examiners or Assistant Examiner to all new patents involving fluids moving on porosity (capillary, capillarity, porous, porosity, wick, wicking);
4. I need a financial compensation till the problem of USPTO negligence with my patents is fixed. My project pursuing a ‘scientific discovery’ is being deeply harmed in the last three years by this massive scientific patent infringement and ethic breach shying away potential licensees, scaring my Patent Attorneys and frustrating my family on their income need. I need a support to bring my project to where it was supposed to be if USPTO had done its duty.
5. Bring my claims and statements to public and make an official declaration on the scope of my concerns. Potential licensees do not believe that USPTO is going to honor my PhD textbooks. I have no doubt that the outcome of my ‘scientific discovery’ project would have had better results if USPTO were doing its job as I expected it from the early beginning.
I have no resentment with USPTO since public institutions are prone to fail once in a while. I read that around 200 inmates spent decades behind bars when finally they were declared innocent, received an apology, and a financial compensation as being punished for crimes they did not commit. Perfection in nature allows some room for occasional imperfection and responsibility to repair mistakes.
My ‘scientific discovery’ project is entitled to receive a similar treatment if my claims hold because I am assuming that USPTO cannot afford ignoring common knowledge on textbooks. Taking longer to handle this issue can result in more consequences since knowledge should always be honored.
Kind regards,
Elson Silva, Ph. D.
Tubarc Technologies, LLC
Av. Dr. Júlio Soares de Arruda, 838 Parque São Quirino
CEP 13088-300 - Campinas - SP - Brazil
Phone 55 *19 3256-7265
Email: tubarc@gmail.com
http://tubarc.blogspot.com/
________________________________________________________________________________________________
HYDROTECHNOLOGY - A New Science
Pursuing a balance with NATURE
_____________________________________________________________
This is the tip of the iceberg as of what lies bellow, clearly points out distorted conceptions and beliefs on human culture WHEN LAWS OF MAN IGNORE LAWS OF NATURE.
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
From: Moulis, Thomas <Thomas.Moulis@uspto.gov>
Date: Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy and Brainwashing III – USPTO is preaching to their Patent Examiners that they do not need to be known in the art for judging and allowing IP rights when issuing patents!
To: Elson Silva, PhD <tubarc@gmail.com>
You are a fool---
If you can’t understand legal or technical writing, you have no business blogging about it
“Wicking” is a term of art---fluid will travel in any direction via the fibers—regardless of gravity
-------------------
"Wick/wicking is in the patent classification system but not on HYDROLOGY textbooks."
LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):
Thermal/Heat Conductivity 176.074 pat.
Electric/Electrical Conductivity 139.254 pat.
Hydraulic Conductivity 1.329 pat.
Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity 38 pat.
Wick/wicking 66.415 pat.
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
LEGAL WICKING as the term of the art regardless of gravity confirms USPTO long standing bias ignoring hydrology on conductivity parameters of issued patents (11/30/23):
Thermal/Heat Conductivity 176.074 pat.
Electric/Electrical Conductivity 139.254 pat.
Hydraulic Conductivity 1.329 pat.
Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity 38 pat.
Wick/wicking 66.415 pat.
The US Government states that LEGAL WICKING is not technical, being inert to gravity LAW, meaning that LEGAL OIL LAMPS and LEGAL CANDLES can work upsided down. This sort of deceiving is behind the Economic Melting Down of 2008 burning about 41 trillion dollars, also dumping 1,1 million American as the leader of the COVID-19 pandemic catastrophe that took around 7 million lives world widely. In addition, obesity and sedentarism letting human beings miss brain capacity by becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenesis effect.
Science is our understanding on nature functioning. Humans learn to respect nature early as babies on the first steps taming gravity for walking and running. Soon we understand the consequences of missteping and falling down. Therefore, all issued patents dealing with wick/wicking are CERTAINLY frauded because PATENT EXAMINERS ignored their homework from the beginning of their lives - GRAVITY.
Sir Isaac Newton defined the Law of Universal Gravitation in 1687. He was inspired to formulate his theory of gravitation by watching the fall of an apple from a tree.
Enviada em: quarta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2011 11:36
Para: Elson Silva, PhD
Assunto: RE: {SPAM?} Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION
---------------------------------
Steven V. Owen
University Professor Emeritus
Educational Psychology
---------------------------------
Dr. Owen, my medicine is a bit bitter than that one swallowed by Albert Einstein by just stretching his tongue:
_____________________________________________________________
This email from an Emeritus Faculty of Educational Psychology provided valuable insights and feedback showing how deep the academic community is compromised on scientific affairs in the US.They were supposed to know that Darcy’s Law on Hydraulic Conductivity is not written in the US constitution, but endorsed by Mother Nature.
_____________________________________________________________
Nobel Prize is IMPORTANT TO HUMAN KIND, as 50% is business, 40% politics, 5% bad science and 5% good science from an educated abstraction. Nobel Prize Nomination of Economic Science was introduced to pretend that Human Business could overlap nature functioning. THE US AS THE FIRST ECONOMIC POWER IN THE WORLD GRABBED TWO-THIRDS (411/621) OF NOBEL PRIZE NOMINATIONS FOR SCIENCE. Exploratory Analysis shows that the American scientific community has been violating Hydrology science in the Patenting System more than a century, leaving a gap huge enough for a new science Hydrotechnology. It seems that working with the Chemistry of explosives is far more profitable than the Hydrology of self-watering flower pots. Mr. Alfred Nobel, Arms Dealer, Merchant of Death, and Father of Dynamite, got 355 patents and Albert Einstein got 50 issued patents to portray top scientists claiming intellectual property rights. Obesity, Economic Melt Dow, COVID-19 tragedies, and now Reinvention Policy by USPTO are important evidence of American negligence to science misbalance with Nature.
How much NATURE endorses the Economy and Politics? Sunlight and rain come to us FREE OF CHARGE, regardless of BOUNDARIES, making the Economy not a science, but a distorted human affair as basic Laws of offer and demand is being replaced by GREED and FEAR. Likewise, recent wars in Ukraine and Israel show us that Politics can’t be science, but a wicked manipulation on human issues wasting innocent lives and spoiling the landscape for weaponry industry profit and disguised interest as Homo sapiens misses simple rationality.
In my neighborhood, I saw the Scientific Police taking pictures of swings I installed on trees for children in the Park during the COVID-19 pandemic lock down. Society try to employ the word SCIENCE for POWER, but there is a misunderstanding as scientific principles claim TRANSPARENCY and HONESTY. Nature is in charge of SCIENCE as there is no POLICE to enforce Nature LAWS. Even religion try to use Scientology for credibility. I like the simple conception that God = Nature. However, Nature writes no books, promises no lands, no life after death, no war or death in name of a divine. In around 4 billions of years of our planet, it seems that we got no aliens to affect our evolution. Most probable we are not leaving our home until the end in 4 to 6 billions of years. Human challenge is to keep nuclear weapons safe, cropping soils, mining our minerals and preserve our home in balance with nature functioning, making our blue planet good for all humans.
What we see in the universe is just for light travelling.
It seems that few scientists do understand the meaning of their titles PhD as Philosophy Doctor coming from Philosophy of Science (Epistemology, Metaphysics, Logics, and History of Science).
Abraham Duncan StroockPara: Elson Silva, PhD
Abe
Enviada em: terça-feira, 22 de abril de 2014
Cc: cko3@cornell.edu; TDO1@cornell.edu; MGS22@cornell.edu; SBW11@cornell.edu;
Assunto: RES: [06856] Protecting Hydrology Science from REINVENTION by corrupt LAY PEOPLE colluding with USPTO - US Pat 8,701,469
_________________________________________________________________
- 29 years ago, I got PhD in Soil Science at Penn State University, USA, working with
Spatial Dynamics of Hydrology in the Amazon Basin.
- 27 years ago, I started playing ADVANCED GARDENING, at home on watering flowerpots
to ease emotional pressure from INSTITUTIONAL JOB HARASSMENT.
- 24 years ago, I filed my first American patent believing that the system was genuine
and HONESTY was a common sense to honor a 'scientific breakthrough', mainly in
the ACADEMIC ENVIRONMENT.
- 21 years ago, my first patent US 6.766,817 was easily issued by USPTO. deploying the
technical terminology from my PhD textbooks uncommon in the Patenting System.
- 10 years ago, I created a new science Hydrotechnology to explore a huge scientific gap
ignoring Hydraulic Conductivity on fluidic devices. defining new Hydrodynamic
Conceptions based on Advanced Artificial Porosity, absent on textbooks.
- In 2025 based on updated Hydrodynamics on porosity I set the HYDROLOGY CRADLE TO
70,000 YEARS AGO starting a new Era of Hydrology by the principle of life.
- For TWO DECADES the principles of ‘tubarc’ to upgrade capillarity has been confirmed by
broad and persistent patent infringement cracking down a sort of Reinvention Policy by USPTO neglecting Hydrology SCIENCE shamefully. This culture degradation is wealthy, obese, sedentary, addict to drugs, vitamins, anti-depressants, electronics, fastfood, etc., becoming grumpier and dumber on neurogenic effect. By ignoring science, the US was the leader in human tragedies that lost more citizens to Sars-Cov-2 than all wars combined. Only when hospitals got clogged and collective nocturnal trenched burials, convinced that saving lives was more relevant than making money. So, the American President who recommended Hydroxychloroquine to treat Covid-19 is back pardoning criminals who invaded the US Capitol. How about Presidential Orders to force Americans on HEALTHY LIVESTYLES and HONESTY, mainly on EDUCATIONAL AFFAIRS? China is also waging on DICTARTORSHIP to preserve the culture. As Freedom of Expression is a business aiming at PROFIT, since peace and good deeds are too boring for the media developing businesses, while greed, fear, ambition, and tragedies making the world unbearable is the perfect recipe for a WEALTHY PRESS.
Quanto tempo vamos ficar monitorando as barragens de
resíduos minerais?
Seria 10 mil, 50 mil ou um milhão de anos até que a rocha triturada dos resíduos minerais se transforme em solo e fique estável na paisagem sem afetar o sistema de drenagem da bacia hidrográfica?
Qual é o tamanho da tragédia necessária para corrigir o problema da mineração?
Parecer Técnico de um Cientista, PhD em Solos nos EUA:
A barragem de Brumadinho, e muitas outras, nem deveriam existir por estar na forma geométrica imprópria, côncava em vez de convexa, descendente e o material granular a base de rocha triturada não oferece resistência mecânica de longa duração, ainda mais para reter resíduos minerais danosos ao funcionamento do meio ambiente por ser oriundos de rocha bruta que não passou pelo processo natural de intemperização na formação dos solos.
"O formato côncavo além de oferecer uma menor resistência possui a propriedade de propagação em cadeia de enfraquecimento contínuo com o afastamento das partículas e imediata liberação do material retido em alta velocidade com poder destruidor assombroso como aconteceu em Brumadinho. Isto quer dizer que outros eventos danosos iminentes podem acontecer a qualquer momento nos mesmos padrões!"
O formato côncavo da barragem é a explicação mais lógica para a explosão instantânea e liberação de todo o material retido.
Formato côncavo = distanciamento das partículas e perda de resistência - EXPLOSÃO
Formato convexo = aproximação das partículas e aumento da resistência – RUPTURA GRADUAL OU RETENÇÃO
Como pode ser verificado na paisagem do Rio de Janeiro, as rochas naturais possuem alta resistência mecânica que é totalmente perdida pela moagem da rocha no processo de mineração.
Solução simples e permanente para uma extração mineral segura:
Retornar os resíduos minerais para as cavidades de extração mineral de tal forma que estes resíduos jamais possam escoar para o sistema de drenagem natural da bacia hidrográfica. Qualquer barragem para contenção de resíduos minerais precisa ser de rocha natural in situ, ou concreto armado de preferência temporário.
Senhor Presidente, a ciência do solo possui conhecimentos importantes para corrigir e direcionar a técnica de mineração que se mostra muito falha com erros técnicos básicos grosseiros resultando em catástrofes graves que afetam os brasileiros com muitas fatalidades e danos ao patrimônio e meio ambiente.
MARCO ANTONIO FERREIRA: "Já li inúmeros comentários de
leitores. Mas, creio, certamente esse é o mais intenso e coerente. Meus
cumprimentos, Tubarc. Não é sempre que conseguimos encontrar pessoas que pensem
no País, ao invés de defenderem ideologias. Aliás, isso é raro!"
MUTIRÃO: "Tubarc, parabéns pelos comentários. Todos pertinentes. Ensino aos meus filhos sobre o poder da HONESTIDADE e acredito nela. Pena que o Brasil chegou neste nível tão baixo neste quesito. QUANTAS GERAÇÕES PARA CONSERTAR ISSO?”
TRAGÉDIAS DO BRASIL– Nas boates alguns jovens gostam de fugir sem pagar a conta. Então os empresários lacram tudo e só deixa a saída do caixa. Economizam no material antifogo da esponja de isolamento acústico e ignoram as medidas de segurança. As autoridades falham nas inspeções de segurança e 242 jovens morrem queimados na BOATE KISS quando combinam DIVERSOS EVENTOS NEGATIVOS. As mineradoras trituram as rochas em busca de minérios. A VALE cria uma infraestrutura de estrada de ferro de mais de 500 km para escoar cerca de metade das rochas extraídas e o rejeito fica largado NEGLIGENTEMENTE fora das crateras deixando os refugos minerais escoarem para o oceano pela bacia hidrográfica prejudicando milhares de pessoas. Aloca recursos para a entrega do produto à mais de 500 km e ignora recursos para retornar os rejeitos à menos de 2 km do local de origem, levando ao estouro de barragens tendo quase 300 fatalidades e danos ambientais incalculáveis. É como primatas que comem a banana e joga a casca no chão, deixando a reciclagem por conta da mãe Natureza, como se ROCHA MOÍDA fosse SOLO prontinho para cultivar abobrinha, pior que nem LAMA É. . . . SERÁ QUE VOU PRECISAR DE CRAYON PARA SER ENTENDIDO?
IRINEU TRENTIN JUNIOR: "Meu velho, a sensatez te acompanha."
PETRÓLEO e MINÉRIO DE FERRO só para a EXPLORAÇÃO quando acabam. As tragédias da mineração é uma situação que está apenas começando. Dizem pelas estimativas que em menos de 500 anos os combustíveis fósseis se esgotam. Quanto tempo vai levar para esgotar os minérios de ferro do mundo? Se a VALE criou uma estrada de ferro de mais de 500 km até o Porto de Tubarão para escoar cerca de metade da rocha extraída em minério, precisa de uma LOGÍSTICA SIMPLES de menos de 2 km para retornar o refugo rochoso triturado para o local de origem! Seria como primatas que comem a banana e joga a casca no chão deixando que a Natureza faça a reciclagem. A NATUREZA já sabe reciclar resíduos orgânicos da cozinha, por isso criei o IRO (Injetor de Resíduos Orgânicos), mas quantidades maciças de rocha moída em clima chuvoso como rejeitos da mineração é uma situação nova em 4,5 bilhões de anos de existência do nosso planeta!
FRANCISCA FURTADO: "Verdade, meu caro Elson. Agradecemos a você pela sua contribuição, que para o mundo é maravilhoso ao passo que para o atual governo não representa mais. Já tive o prazer de cotar o seu ‘Fluid conduction utilizing a reversible unsaturated siphon with tubarc porosity action’ em um trabalho e acredite: seu esforço faz a diferença. Juntos pela defesa da educação superior."
POR QUE FALTA HONESTIDADE NA CULTURA BRASILEIRA? Se os jovens fossem bem honestos e gostassem de pagar as contas, a Boate Kiss não teria todos os banheiros lacrados com uma saída ÚNICA pelo CAIXA. A tragédia foi a combinação da DESONESTIDADE coletiva com outros níveis no gerenciamento e segurança . . . o Brasileiro joga lixo na rua porque não valoriza a COISA PÚBLICA. Nos EUA onde morei 4 anos fazendo PhD, os banheiros públicos são tão limpos quanto os de casa. O brasileiro precisa adquirir o valor da coisa pública como um bem de todos para cuidar como se fosse seu, NADA DE LEVAR PARA CASA . . . A HONESTIDADE começa em casa no berço desde pequenino quando aprendemos a respeitar a GRAVIDADE e dar os passinhos corretos e sentimos a dor da negligência e queda pelos passos errados . . . A VIDA É ASSIM . . .OS PRÍNCIPIOS DA COEXISTÊNCIA SÃO IMUTÁVEIS . . . (Vale ressaltar que ANALFABETOS não possuem contas bancárias em paraísos fiscais, enquanto os CORRUPTOS passaram por um processo educacional e não absorveram os príncipios da HONESTIDADE).
CARLOS M P: "Grande cientista. Resta saber em que e
quem é você..."
WASANTOS: "PhD eu também sou, mas não faço flooding dessa bobagem que você diz ter acontecido..."
HONESTIDADE é a ARMA que MAIS protege a sociedade! Sou PhD em Solos - Philosophy Doctor lá nos EUA e o Bill Clinton, Presidente dos EUA foi o orador da minha formatura em 10-05-96 na Penn State Univ. . . não espalha para o PRESIDENTE . . mas, a FILOSOFIA controla os fundamentos da ciência . . . Estou criando uma nova CIÊNCIA, a HIDROTECNOLOGIA. . . uma lacuna de quase um século na Hidrologia dos meios porosos . . .A ciência que vai salvar os MINEIROS da mineração irresponsável, pois ROCHA TRITURADA, não é LAMA e nem solo . . .pode até ser solo um dia se passarmos alguns milhares de anos monitorando as BARRAGENS DE REJEITOS MINERAIS . . O FRACASSO POLÍTICO NÃO MELHORA O NOSSO PAÍS . . . A minha ciência está CRAVADA como patente no USPTO (US 6.766.817.
MARIOCAMBUI: "Sensacional! Sucesso a você...até porque precisamos muito do teu sucesso."
É lúdico falar que sou PhD, pois nem o PRESIDENTE DA REPÚBLICA sabe bem o que é isto . . .DOUTOR FILÓSOFO em português, pois a FILOSOFIA determina os princípios do funcionamento da CIÊNCIA (Filosofia, Epistemologia, Metafísica, Lógica e História da Ciência). Isto mostra como a baixa escolaridade brasileira é abrangente e atinge até os políticos! Os Juristas trabalham com as Leis do Homem e os Cientistas com as Leis da Natureza, que são bem mais consistentes. Tenho certeza de que não vão LEGISLAR ou JULGAR a LEI DA GRAVIDADE. A Lei de Darcy é sobre a transmitância hídrica em meios porosos, velocidade em distância/tempo, ou volume/área/tempo . . . aprendemos a respeitar a NATUREZA quando bebezinhos nos primeiros passinhos para caminhar e sabemos da punição pela negligência dos passos errados por ignorar a LEI DA GRAVIDADE . . . Poxa, ROCHA TRITURADA não é LAMA mesmo. A LAMA é aquele negócio que gruda nos sapatos e o carro patina, e até dá para plantar muita CEBOLINHA! Quanta ignorância na terra do CABRAL.
PAULO SEDDIG: "Sim, isso é verdade."
A ciência é guiada pela filosofia e por isso os cientistas recebem a titulação de PhD (Philosophy Doctor). A Epistemologia determina a estrutura do conhecimento: O que posso saber e como tenho certeza de que sei? A Metafísica determina os limites da existência das coisas. O que existe no universo? Algo para ser científico precisa existir primeiro. A Lógica determina a melhor maneira de expressar as ideias. A ciência é bem mais limitante do que se acredita. Não sabemos sobre os limites do universo e nem como a vida originou, nem foi registrado a origem da vida e não tem como ser refeito dentro dos princípios que aconteceram. Como cientista PhD gosto da concepção simples Deus = Natureza. A natureza não escreve livros, não promete vida após a morte, não pede guerras em seu nome. Aprendemos a respeitar a natureza quando bebês nos primeiros passinhos e sabemos sobre a punição pela negligência à gravidade nos passos errados pela queda imediata.
MAISDEMENOS: "Tameim concordo, tuba."
IMPRENSA - As pessoas são meio inocentes na vida. A imprensa
não é nem contra e nem a favor do GOVERNO, muito pelo contrário. A liberdade de
expressão trabalha atrás do lucro e migra para os campos mais lucrativos. Pelos
meus entendimentos de Cientista PhD lá nos EUA que tem patente americana e
criador de uma nova ciência a HIDROTECNOLOGIA, afundar o Brasil dá mais
dinheiro em LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO do que ajudar a salvar a nação. O CAOS e o
MEDO geram um lucro danado para os meios de comunicação. Então, ficamos assim,
a imprensa não é contra, ela se esforça para ficar lucrativa e rentável. Quanto
mais o país se afunda, mais a mídia enriquece e o povão que precisa de CRAYON
empobrece. O triste é que o empobrecimento aumenta a obesidade . . . as pessoas
precisam ler nas entrelinhas, e também ler o que não está escrito e abrir os
olhos além da ponta do nariz . . . estou com receio de precisar desenhar no
futuro . .. já estou adquirindo uma caixa de CRAYON! (Fico perplexo quando vejo reportagens mostrando obesos passando fome . . .)
